Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Buddist Quakers I believe.  |
Does not matter, it already is discrimination that the female attacker was called "female". That is criminalising 3 billion women and girls in the world.
Male humans also share an X-chromosome, btw.
I also want to remind of the fact that that act planned by that person, is probably just a reaction to a provocative move by other persons in the legislations (no mentioning of their X and Y chromosomes).
Also, do not forget Northern Ireland, or the man in the blue coat waiting at the airport at Lahore, but his train never came as far as I know. Do we really have the right to judge the deeds of others? A Burkha is just a a textile-enriched special version of a Bikini, and the Army of Jijhad, the Salvation army - what is the difference? Army is army. The latter even is more militant - it has ranks.
I also recently learned that if we do not wish to be called tyrants ourselves, we have toi give others the freedom to destroy our freedom, else we would be seen as destructive as "they" are. No, we would be even more evil!
I should not say "they", I realise. Using this term alongside other terms like "us" and "them" just raises walls and polarises cultural conflicts that in reality do not exist since all cultures are of the same value and all religions in general express the same things. Facism and libertarianism are just two different forms of freedom. we should understand it as a political enrichment of our communities if we embrace them both in our middle.
Politically most correct it would be if we say that no person does not plan to not launch no action in a culturally motivated conflict that is culturally fully explainable, but not existent.
So what the heck are you guys even talking about? Everything's fine.