[Skybird]

1.

Illegal immigration is just that: illegal. Politicians, left wealth-redistributors and social know-it-alls ignored it both in content and volume for very long years. In europe, it is a problem printed in capital letters too. And if you follow the poltiical events in europe, you see that the tide of public opinion is slowly shifting. Right parties have emerged from former conservative camps that are not racist or Nazi in themselves, but collect those many voters that got fed up by the former conservatiove parties having shifted into the poltical center and the even the left side of the political spectrum. In Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, nw right-oreinted poltical movements made it in to the parliaments for the first time, often immediatly after they were founded. In these countries they currently can tip the balance in coalition forming. In France, Italy, Poland, strong rightwinged camps, that partially are openly facist (Italy), are part of the poltiial spectrum since long. And with the current debate around Thilo Sarrazin and migration in Germany,, and all conservative heavy-weights having turned their back on the CDU in frustration in recent months, it seesm to be only a question of time before even in Germany a new conservatove party right of the CDU will form up.

And honestly said, I think that is needed. It also is the natural result of career-poltiicans thinking for too long that they can afford to ignore urgent problems with migration, Islam and crime rates, and must not take serious the wide-spread sentiment of the general public that the nation gets lethally damaged by following these leftist policies anymore.

2.

If you join a foreign nation'S armed forces and do a certain ammount of service time, especially in wartimes, then you risk your life for that nation. That could be for two reasons. Either you do it for money only, then you are a mercenary and that nation has no further obligations towards you then to pay your the money that was mentioned in the contract. Or you do it because you feel attracted to that nation for any reason: then risking your life for it really is a strong statement that you make. In that case, after a certain ammount of service time or time spend in wartime action you should be ggrantedc citizenship as a reward indeed. In England they just have had a debate on this issue, regarding the Gurkhas. The service time should not be so brief only that it just serves as an excuse for allowing legalising illegal migration through the backdoor. It really should be a sacrifice in time spent, and risks taken. Sitting two years in a safe garrison inside said nation, is not enough, imo. Having done one or two tours in a hot shooting war, or having spend 8 years or so in a non-fighting unit, sounds more like it. No matter the specifics - you get the idea. The citizenship gained that way, indeed should be deserved, it should be a reward for services done, no investement in advance over hopes that the person maybe in the future will do something valuable for that nation.

3.

However, the recruiting of foreigners for the armed forces nevertheless should be done outside the nation doing it, else the foreigners turn into illegals by entering thta nation and then trying to legalise their status by entering the armed forces. Or better, since I have a problem with active advertsiing and recrutiing for the armed forces, offices should be maintained in other countries where foreigners can enlist. Or they should be able to do it in embassies.