It's painfully obvious we don't live in a perfect world. But that's not the sort of thing I would expect or suffer from brittish military personnel without a big outcry and investigation, it's just not professional imo (acknowleges court investigations and the recognition of discussing this subject etc). However making the civilian population do the army's 'dirty work' at gunpoint is not on. You joing the army and 'takes the crown's money', then expect to go into harms way, right? as the article says : you don't exploit the civillian population for the army's military needs- irrespective of the enemy you're fighting.
Dunno, just seems very wrong to me somehow.
__________________
when you’ve been so long in the desert, any water, no matter how brackish, looks like life
|