Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man
So believing in a large religious phisoophy is seen as dangerous, but believing in a lagre government is not seen as dangerous?
Both require a narrative and belief to survive.
|
I do not believe in religious pseudofact, nor do I believe anything that a member of a government tells me. In that sense they are similar I guess, they both talk a lot of talk about nothing in particular and avoid answering simple questions in a straight-forward manner.
To correct your spelling though (sorry), Lager has a druglike soporific power that cannot be denied, I do believe in the power (and the danger) of Lager, especially those strong foreign ones. If Carlsberg ran the government... Who knows?