Gutted was producing the piece of software, not the method. The method is based on standard US and other navy TMA and surely has nothing really unique about it.
Looks like greyrider is setting up to sue Aaronblood for half the profits from MoBo too!
Again, failed magician greyrider posts a fraudulent, irrelevanct screenshot of a lousy roundrel having no bearing on sonar only TMA and makes the implication that he beat Gutted and the other two cited. That was predictable, as is my reaction.
Check out greyrider's horse squeeze about the 8010 technique and then read gutted's description of how
his piece of software (The brilliant greyrider has produced no SH software of any kind! Note how when I claim something I link people to it so they can check it out to their own satisfaction. Greyrider has things to hide, so he doesn't do that.) works, then load up the .pdf file by yet another named and credited author which takes you by the hand and fulfills all ten characteristics of a valid targeting method except that it be popularly adopted.
8010: ten times a loser.
Hydrophone Tracker software plus the TMA method it uses: nine and soon to be ten times a winner. And 8010 is only ten times a loser because we haven't thought too hard about what other necessary qualifications it lacks.
I invite everyone to compare the two to see the stark difference between buffoonery and valid method. Nobody will be left with a shadow of a doubt which is which. Even greyrider knows the truth. Everyone can learn to use the
Hydrophone Tracker and most will shoot as well as gutted can. Not one person can successfully learn and use 8010. It is a waste of space, empty boasting substituting for teaching, a circular reference posing as applicable theory.