View Single Post
Old 09-14-10, 03:48 PM   #23
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
True, but it's getting bad press. Articles written by writers who don't even know what a sugar is, read by people who don;t know what a sugar is. The same press that continues to present patent nonsense like the (utter non-existent, and in fact fraudulent) claim that mercury was related to autism.

The guys making the stuff of course are perfectly happy with the average person consuming 10s of gallons of soda a year (hundreds?), mind you, but I don't blame them, I blame the people drinking the stuff.

Having the name change on the label is not a problem, because people who know what the different sugars actually are, and how they work, will not have a problem, and the others are not well enough informed for me to care much about them getting "tricked" by a change. Again, if they cannot explain the difference extemporaneously (and saying, "HFCS is bad, m'kay" is not explaining the difference), the label is meaningless anyway.
Fair enough. And it is certainly true that I would be staying away from it with the name change. It is also true that others will not regardless of the change. I also agree with your point that one's health really boils down to lifestyle.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote