Quote:
Originally Posted by tater
I won't even say "radical" Islam, because even so-called "moderate" Islam is "radical" by Western standards. Look at the "moderate" cleric in question's remarks (translated from Arabic media, not the BS he throws at the US press) regarding apostasy, etc.
|
It is a radical, a conqueror's ideology. Muslims indeed obeying it's dogma and rules, necessarily must be radicals. Muslims refusing to be that, thus are jus that: Muslims disobedient to (and not representative for) the dogma. Islam itself is as radical as the term "radical" can mean.
I also point out that many muslims are offended by this Western deamnd to differ between radical and moderate Islam. On eof the ost prominent voices who have very angrily protested aginst this wetsern idiocy, is Turkey'S pr9me momsiter Erdoghan, who said in real word that it is an offence that the Wesat constantly refers to a distinction between moderate and radical Isalam. He insisted that it is an offence, and that there is and always have been just one islam.
Of curse, the usual band of western idiots and braindead suicide candidates did not consider one minute the possibulity that he might be right and that he might know it better than them. they know so much better what Islam is, these hyperintellectual supermen.
Well, that is what defines an idiot, amongst other criterions: he never listens, he is fully immune to learning, and he always thinks he knows it better.
The West knows better what Islam is than Islam knows itself.
Yeah. Sure.
The West is a mental asylum where doctors and patients are one and the same.
