Quote:
Originally Posted by JScones
Dan, I think you might have misunderstood the intent of my comment.  My comment was meant to sound silly and illogical, to highlight the silliness of "I've met Dan, he's great and loves subsims, so the devs are not to blame" comments that are posted here by the same few every so often. Of course we, and other objective people, know such comments are rubbish and too simplistic. Just like you guys leaving and forming your own company.
And that was the point I was trying to make. 
But thank you for your comments. You have my utmost respect for your open acknowledgement of your contribution to the product, even though I'm sure others here will still stick to their "it's all the suits' fault" mantra... |
I agree that the 'suits' that everyone blames are possibly something of a mythical entity.
But why is it 'silly' to say 'he is a great guy and love subsims'?
Regardless of the outcome of SH5 and his own accountablilties and flaws - that statment needn't be rubbish on its own merrit.
Here is another angle on this matter:
Every time some one praises Dan or defends him, you seem pop up to brand them as a fanboy etc.
Surley you can understand that by repeatedly doing this, it makes you look no less opinionated?
You keep refering to yourself as 'objective' but in your seemlingly persistant quest to tackle the extremists, are you sure that you yourself have not wound up as one at the other end of spectrum??
Because that is how it is starting to look.