View Single Post
Old 08-25-10, 05:32 PM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,620
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schroeder View Post
Not just the tanks. The fighterbombers are also getting drastically reduced. No need for airpower on a modern battlefield...
The draft can't be upheld if only a handful of people really get drafted. It's unfair. However I don't see how an army without the draft could grow to sufficient numbers quickly enough if the brown stuff should ever hit the fan again.
But Naumann has some good arguments in defense of drafting. I was not aware that such a big ammount of pros were recruited from conscripts, for example - that means to raise a personell pool much easier and economically than the expensive recruiting efforts certain propfessijanl armies must conduct. what he said on the need that a CO cannot afford to rely on his stars, but must earn the trust of his subordinates newly every time new draftees are coming, also made sense to me.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote