Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
So you are talking of fundamental changes in law and a loophole that doesn't exist.
Look at all the trouble that was caused when the fishermen were sunk and left to drown.
|
the loophole would exist when the laws would be passed. Laws need changing as time goes forward. the situation changed, laws must be changed. And when it comes to the fishermen, 100m from a major vessel is a no-go zone. If zone breached the vessel will be boarded, if no weapons found: have a nice day and a bountifull catch. If the vessel starts showing that it is hostile or confirmed hostile from other boats (a UAV should start tracking it) then this should follow
I'm not a supporter of gun blazing diplomacy and doctrine, but I am a supporter of protecting the waterways by any means