Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thanos
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joea
And some would say just the Greek Orthodox, who did not introduce certain "innovations" that the Roman church did like the Filoque clause, the pretentsions of the Bishop of Rome etc. :P
|
And some would argue in the case of the Roman church, as it did not alter the accepted view of early Christendom that Christ was indeed imortal. The argument is circular, and without answer, which is why the schism remains today. |
Huh? Since when does Orthodoxy not accept the immortality of christ? The council of Nicaia decided on the dual nature of christ (and that was in order to counter Aryanism).
From my high school recollections, one of the points of the schism was the divine nature of *Mary*. The *real* issues however were ones of politics and power.
Ok, back to topic for the rest of you now  |
You spell that Arianism, Aryanism is another thread. :rotfl: