View Single Post
Old 08-07-10, 08:12 PM   #182
frau kaleun
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Skyri--oh who are we kidding, I'm probably at Lowe's. Again.
Posts: 12,706
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
If there must be more benefits for a couple raising a child in your mind, why not then have a separate clause in the law making it so that marriages, regardless of the sex of those involved, get benefits and protections a, while those married couples who also raise a child get a+1?
I admit I'm ignorant of how the $ works out on this issue, but doesn't the fact that you can claim children as dependents for tax purposes already mean we give extra consideration to someone who is raising a child vs. someone who isn't?

I always thought being able to claim a dependent or dependents translated into some kind of tax break that someone without dependents didn't get (all other considerations being equal).
frau kaleun is offline   Reply With Quote