[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Platapus

Do you also believe that women who are barren or men who are sterile should not be permitted to marry? They also don't add anything to the "biological securing your society". How about couples who choose not to have kids? Should they also be forbidden to marry as they don't add anything either?

See:

Originally Posted by Skybird

I am aware of not every hetero cople having children - but hetero couples are the only couple constellations that could have children, and still: many have at least one child. On e the one hand I want to outline the basic logic only and thus did not go into details like "has a couple children indeed or not?", on the other hand one could argue that within the group of hetero couples now opening this can of worms of endlessly defining subcategories and excemptions rom rules, only increases the number of rules we have, and bureaucracy, and threatens to overshadow what it really is about: to recignise that the family is the most vital social core cell of a community, that it is a thosuand tikes more important than gay marriages or signles like I am, and that a society depends on creatong a social climate hwere this fact is not endlessly relatives and thus: endangered, damaging our own future survival perspective as a nation and a national community.