Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
Okay, then I'll get to basics.
3) Do you say this mosque should not be built? How do you propose we do that (within the law)?
|
IMO no it should never be built at that site because it is tantamount to spitting on the dead bodies from the WTC
so many completely miss the fact that that site as it was originally zoned wouldnt allow a mosque to be built there (i believe historic or something) but they bent over backwards changing local zoning laws and ordinences so a religeous building could be built there so lets not forget how major changes were made specifically to create a situation where a mosque could be built in the first place. this isnt simply a completely legally normal situation where they came in and wanted to build something that is normally allowed but people dont want to allow it because its muslums.
the law as it previously was written said the mosque could not be built there before it was changed so unchange it to how it was and the law states the mosque cant be built for zoning reasons and then first amendment and religeon have nothing to do with it.
this religeous freedom first amendment crap is all BS smokescreen to avoid the fact that this mosque is intended as a monument to the great victory over america and to memorialize and honor the terrorists who blew it up.
the whole arab world is laughing at how stupid the americans are and like sheep to be lead around in the name of tollerance and understanding.