[Kazuaki Shimazaki II]

Originally Posted by August

So the bottom line is you hardly care if a few people and their families get killed. You even attempt to marginalize them by calling them "informers". Heck you should have just swung for the fences and called them "collaborators" or even go old school and call them "Quislings".

If you twist my words like that, by analogy, when the US bombs people, they don't care if a few people get killed, since as we all know precision-guided bombs are not perfectly reliable, as are the intelligence used to target them.

Let me clue you in on something dude. The "default state" of classified military intelligence reports is just that, classified. You, Assange. Manning, or the NYT do not have a right to decide which of it is ok to give to our enemies.

Wrong. The default state of information in the military is unclassified. Then someone places a Classified stamp on it. Don't confuse the sequence of events.

Now, here's a question for you: If this whole story had involved the operational details of another country, say perhaps it was 92,000 reports of Russian activities in Chechenya, would you be saying good job to whoever leaked it?