So your defense is that the film is edited? Well of course. Every film is edited. If they shot 20 minutes worth of film, if it took 20 minutes to gun down all the men in the water, you expect 20 minutes of youtube video? Or 30 minutes. It also showed a sub torpedoing a ship. But we didn't see hours and hours of film. We saw the torpedo explosion. Does this mean that what we witnessed may not have actually been a torpedo attack because it was edited? What is the logic of that argument?
You're saying the film proves nothing because it is not one unedited scene. Well, the film of the moon landing I suppose, by that logic, proves nothing either. It too was edited. A scene here, a scene there. And what of it? This film documents a massacre. And this thread wondered if such a thing was documented by the allied side. So here is a film to document that. One can either accept it at face value, or question what your eyes are showing you, and entertain the notion that maybe no sailors were shot in the water - it just sort of appeared that way.
|