07-24-10, 01:33 PM
|
#39
|
|
Chief of the Boat
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,300
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tater
100% is a reasonable standard when the crime is murder. We have 100% proof that she's capable of murdering children. We have less than 100% proof that she'll never do it again.
If the perp is NOT insane, then I'd say for murdering 2 kids, they should get either death, or life in prison—no getting out except in a box, period, not ever—I'm fine with life in prison with no parole instead of the death penalty, but I do think they should have no "perks" in prison (no TV, radio, etc). There is some chance >0 that they will kill again. Having murdered, they lose any benefit of the doubt from ME, anyway. I'll never trust they are rehabilitated. Never.
In the case of someone insane, I think the same rules apply. They might be treatable, but they could possibly relapse. Since a relapse could mean more dead, tough, they need to be incarcerated for life. What type of facility I'm open to debate about, but she should never walk the streets again.
|
That's pretty much how I see it...and posted two posts prior 
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!
|
|
|