Quote:
Originally Posted by Webster
IMO sh5 as released and patched from ubi - sh5 sucks 
sh5 after it is fixed by the mods made by the modders at this site and others - sh5 rocks 
IMO they are two different games that cant be viewed as the same |
I hope you right Webster for the sake of all of us and to put a end to all this fire-crossing-words-fight coz atm SH5 rocks but in the bottom of the ocean floor that is where it is now
As it stands SH4 is far better game than SH5 is atm and with and without mods and same goes for SH3 with or without mods... and same can be said about SH2 + DC without any mods (put aside bugs and DRM)
So who is the player that in the right mind will be wasting money on an half baked product knowing that is not finished and hopping in a good will of others (forget DRM plus bugs for a second... just looking at playability of the subject... WWII war period)
Now if (big IF) SH5 gets fully modded like SH3 and if (big IF) there are no hardcode constraints that put a stop on introducing all the missing WWII period then agree it will stand some chance of resurfacing... but in the state that SH5 is atm, negative it was a sub that went down and fast.
At end of the day UBI will be laughing if is not already laughing at all this mess of a rushed product out of the window and without minimum of quality standards. They will also be laughing in the future by profiting from game sales of SH5 (half baked) simply because others (unpaid workers) finished the game for UBI and all for free. That only set a very bad example to a corporation that did and does crap and give a damn to all here plus their own customers. Cheers