Quote:
Originally Posted by daft
Agreed. There are more guilty parties besides Ubi in this case. A self fulfilling prophecy of ever I saw one. "The subsim genre is dead". Well, it certainly has taken a big step towards that state, but the blame lies not only with Ubi or the devs...
|
Thats one comment I will NEVER agree with.
Thats like GM producing crap quality cars then wondering why thier sales are far below that of Ford or Toyota. Blame the car purchasers...ya thats it.
Even the reviews in PC GAMER both pre and post patch suck, which almost NEVER reviews games before and after patch (thier policy is to only review the Gold release). And PC gamer reviewed SH5 as a causal gamer would look at the game.
I do however agree that looking at the fiasco of unfinished state in a negative light and saying "Sh 5 will never be good" short changes our MODDERS here. I feel HONORED to belong to a community where FREE MODS done with the sweat off the brows of modders here can SAVE a game that had a budget and PAID staff to produce. Hence why I feel UBI will never release a SDK (willingly) because our modders will make UBI look VERY VERY bad with what they can do. However...would be nice if the SDK would somehow end up "leaked".....illegal I know..sorry UBI but by releasing crap you brought this on yourself.. (by this I mean like how the SDK ended up in modders hands for Falcon 2.0 or how a dev for BAttlezone 2 eneded up working on and patching the game 8 years latter to something GREAT after the publisher abandoned the title).