Quote:
Originally Posted by John Channing
I see where SH5 does not have a development team. I don't see where it says it can't have a development team.
As far as what is or is not in the thread goes everything stated there (and here) is uninformed speculation... nothing more. The only fact we have is that Ubisoft has seen fit to have a "Community Manager" present in the forums.
My point was that the only person who actually knows what he is taking about provided some (I thought) pretty good suggestions and most of the the responses here were, shall we say, less than generous. I actually thought that, for the sake of enlightened self-interest if nothing else, people would have taken advantage of this opportunity. Clearly I was wrong.
I get that it is much more fun to bitch and moan and pound out snide remarks, but with the same number of keystrokes, they may have been able to accomplish something positive.
Oh well...
JCC
|
There is an inherent problem here John, we have to constantly take advantage of an opportunity. This happened in SH4 and now SH5. Does this make sense to anyone? A product is purchased in an unfinished state. The product is loaded with bugs. The product seems to have lost support by UBI. Customer has to take advantage of a community manager possibly becoming a voice in getting SH5 fixed.
Why is it up to the community to accomplish something positive? Why is a community manager beating around the bush? Why not come out and say collect your concerns so I may present them to those that can hit the big switch for getting issues with SH5 corrected? Why must the concerns be collected again for that matter?
I really do not understand why the customer must pander to UBI for a fix.
Oh, to be sure, the community manager said SH5 can not get a development team.
I will let it rest. Such a shame because graphically SH5 is the best I have witnessed in any game. So I play in the unmodded state and enjoy it as best I can.