View Single Post
Old 06-29-10, 03:55 PM   #10
janh
Stinking drunk in Trinidad
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 349
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frumpkis View Post
Yeah, same here. I haven't bought SH5 yet and couldn't answer the poll because it's not a simple issue of DRM or no DRM. I would probably buy the game right now if a major campaign re-write was available. I just don't think I could stand being ordered to go out and "sink 5 warships!"... I want a simulation, not an arcade game.

Also, there there are many good PC games and simulations out right now that I'm having fun with, and new ones on the horizon I'm looking forward to. A game has to be very good to be worth my money and investment of time. I don't want to spend hours "playing" and being frustrated at the same time. When it looks to me like SH5 has crossed that threshold, I'll pick it up.
Well, before release I also was very upset at the idea of this nonsense DRM scheme, something forced onto legal owners that is technically not required. But soon the quality of the product itself came to light, and it was obvious that the developers were pressed into or even agreed to push it out fast instead of completing it. The arcade stuff, the good concept of dynamical campaign badly executed with nonsense goals, the lack of the promised port interactivity and so much stuff incomplete, bugged, superficially working etc. Even without DRM I would rather think I gain more by spending my time with better games. SHV unfortunately had some very good design ideas, and enormous potential, and maybe if modders made it THEIR product (you couldn't possibly call that mods anymore), it could still be brought to fruition. But not now.
__________________
Scientific facts are not determined by the opinion of the majority, nor by a democratic vote.
janh is offline   Reply With Quote