Quote:
|
There shall be NO (re)interpretation of Islamic dogma
|
Yet there always is and there always has been. Every split has been because of different interpretations, the fundamentalism which sky thinks is the only form is a fairly modern split off of two schools who reinterpreted dogma from an absolute literalist perspective with a heavy bias towards some passages while ignoring others.
Quote:
|
The best they can do, is that dogma must be "reshaped" in new fatwas
|
How many new fatwas are issued every year?
How many scholars does it take to issue a fatwa?
Isn't each fatwa and each scholar doing one a reinterpretation?
Quote:
|
He is as troubled, for a lack of a better word, by sharia law, honour killings and special privileges given to Muslims and Muslims only as I am, or as Skybird is.
|
What is sharia law? Again its a matter of interpretastion isn't it as there are many hundreds of versions which is a bit strange since you say there can be only one interpretation.
There was that big daily mail tripe about Britain introducing sharia law and pandering to the muslims, it was a complete pile of rubbish, same with the dozens of daily articles across the media and spouted by politicians which invariably Sky will post as his little fetishism.
BTW what does "honour" murders have to do with Islam? Its a very nasty thing but it comes from many places (including the "civilised" west) and habits so to associate it with one religion is rather disingenuous don't ya think.
Also where the hell do you get this "muslims only" rubbish from?
Can you run through some special privileges given to.... say Jehovas for a start, christians of different flavours, society of friends, sikh, hindus, gypsies.....
Don't you find it funny that you mention Bosnian Muslims yet when you lot had your nice set of civil wars the pile of jihadis that came in from other places to "help" their poor muslim brethren they found that the jihadis thought the locals were not muslim and the locals thought the jihadis were just crazy