There is a VAST VAST VAST difference between whistleblowing and mocking a superior.
First of all whistle blowing is usually done with name off the record. And evidence slowly provided to blow the cover once and for all. Whistleblowers want the activity stopped and not articles in a paper glorifying them.
Mocking a superior openly is arrogant and serves no real purpose other than to create a firestorm and destroy morale. Well that and try to end up an "adviser" to Fox or MSNBC...
The "Fired for speaking his mind" argument is completely bunk.
|