Quote:
Originally Posted by janh
Isn't this a rhetorical question?
|
No, it's not. Rhetorical questions don't require an answer, whereas this poll is a scientific poll asking all those who are fully qualified to know, having examined all of the code of the SH series games, which was the most bugged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by janh
You would better ask: How much more disappointing than SHIV was SHV?
|
Hey! Get your own poll and stop trying to hijack this one. But your question is completely pointless as it is not at all quantitive or qualitive. For example, if you had a poll that asked 'How much more disappointing than SHIV was SHV?' then I would answer not at all, as your question was biassed and badly worded and was not trying to gauge the reception of SH5 turthfully. I could have had such a low expectation for SH5, after having received SH4 that I was expecting a box that went bing and did not CTD as the ultimate subsim after SH4. But your poll question would not catch this point of view. Such a shame, as your poll question would not have captured
why the respondents had given that answer and would not really be of any benefit to anyone at all. Would 'not at all' have been one of your poll options?
Now, on with the expert code analyst views for the current poll.