06-07-10, 09:00 AM
|
#672
|
Silent Hunter 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneToughHerring
Well then there should be no problem in having the UN do a full examination of what happened.
|
yeah right, like that is going to happen, we all know what the results of an "impartial" UN investigation will be:
Quote:
The U.N. Human Rights Council voted 32 to 3 to adopt an Arab and Islamic-sponsored resolution that began by declaring Israel guilty of committing an “outrageous attack” in monday’s Intifada on the high seas, and ended by creating a probe to find the facts.
UN Watch, a non-governmental human rights monitoring group in Geneva, praised the U.S., Italy and Netherlands for opposing the “deeply flawed” text, as well as Belgium, France, Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine, U.K., Japan, South Korea, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Zambia and Madagacar for refusing to support the resolution by abstaining or absenting themselves.
(...)
“Not surprsisingly, the sponsors of the text include the chief military, financial and political sponsors of Hamas — Iran and Syria — along with such tyrannies as genocidal Sudan and dictatorial Libya.”
|
http://blog.unwatch.org/index.php/20...ion-to-israel/
__________________
|
|
|