Quote:
|
The AZ law can add effectiveness for the simple reason that THE FEDERAL LAWS ARE NOT ENFORCED.
|
Caps Lock strikes again, it was the federal law you were using as an example of just how effective enforcement was.
You cannot cite an example of how good the enforcement of immigration law is then suddenly change your mind because its not the law you thought it was.
Quote:
|
If they did their jobs, zero illegals would cross
|
That has to be the most ridiculous claim ever.
Take Israel as an example, they do some really serious border enforcement, they go all out on military, Border force and police deployment, they still get piles of illegal immigrants crossing the border.
Look at Britain, they do border control in their own ports, around the coast and on mainland Europe and still get loads of illegals.
Quote:
|
Armed men crossing the border have a name—invaders.
|
What has that got to do with the price of cheese?
Though if you want to explore that angle how many hundreds of recent incidents of armed men crossing the border happened, meaning of course Mexican and American border patrols accidentally crossing the line as it was discussed by your government and the Mexican government last week.
Quote:
|
My preference would not be shooting, I think the border could be secured without it, but fear of death would go a long way to stop what is extremely casual crossing right now.
|
Has the threat of a death worked well in the past?
Quote:
|
As far as eminent domain, presumably you mean taking land for a fence and road alongside.
|
No the question I posed was about a very wide strip of land nearly 2000 miles long, which I am sure you can grasp is one hell of a lot of land.
A fence and a road alongside would be completely ineffective for what you proposed.