SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

kiwi_2005 · 09-13-05, 04:34 PM

Better than the XXI?. Of course, your in a modern sub that is capable of destroying cities! the difference is you are all about under the sea moving silently searching for sonar contacts and hardly ever surfacing. SH3 is about on the surface looking for targets and only submerging when a target is sited or sometimes staying on the surface and taking the enemy on with the deckgun. SH3 has ww2 uboat war as a reason to create a naval war game, its based on the history that actually happened. Where Modern Sub sims like Sub Command and DW have to make up a "What If" war naval sim, not very realistic. The closest you could get is create a mission where u have to go into the Argentina port and sink a few ships with a british sub, which did happen in the Falklands war.

09-13-05, 04:34 PM	#11
kiwi_2005 Eternal Patrol Join Date: May 2004 Location: Aeoteroa Posts: 7,382 Downloads: 223 Uploads: 1	Better than the XXI?. Of course, your in a modern sub that is capable of destroying cities! the difference is you are all about under the sea moving silently searching for sonar contacts and hardly ever surfacing. SH3 is about on the surface looking for targets and only submerging when a target is sited or sometimes staying on the surface and taking the enemy on with the deckgun. SH3 has ww2 uboat war as a reason to create a naval war game, its based on the history that actually happened. Where Modern Sub sims like Sub Command and DW have to make up a "What If" war naval sim, not very realistic. The closest you could get is create a mission where u have to go into the Argentina port and sink a few ships with a british sub, which did happen in the Falklands war. __________________ RIP kiwi_2005 Those who can't laugh at themselves leave the job to others.