Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OKO
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
We have the right to build them to protect our selves or better our selves. Others do have that right if they remain transparent about their use.
|
so, one day, it won't be 2 tower but entire new york eradiqued by a portable nuke because your phylosophy allowed them to improve their capabilities in this domain instead of stopping it. |
Or the outer solar system is colonized thanks to space craft propelled by Orion Drives. As I said if they remain transparent about nuclear development and use I don't have a problem with other nations doing it, since we know what they are doing and can say stop and make them if they create them with the intent to kill.
Quote:
If NATO say NO to nuke, money spent in this business could be re oriented for surpervision of the respect of this decision.
I'm sure LOTS money will be saved, and the world will be saved also.
|
The world might be "Saved" but humanity would be doomed. The power of an atomic explosion is a power to be harnessed like the wind or sunlight. It can be used for good or evil.
Quote:
If any country have the right to develop nuclear weapon, it will be a probelm very soon.
It's easy to understand.
|
I didn't say any country has a right to. I said only the ones who develop them for peaceful use and remain transparent about their development should have them. Currently only the US, UK, France and Russia are the only ones who come close to this standard.