View Single Post
Old 09-12-05, 10:21 AM   #11
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitain
say in 25 years time france pays off all its SSBN's and a rouge state in africa starts building nuclear missiles and weapons and the people building those weapons hate the french and thier allies for something they done in the past (britain and france had collonies in africa)

so this is pay back time and they would nuke france but heres the catch.

not wanting to be totaly destroyed them selves if france had SSBN's and nuclear weapons it disuades them guys from launching its the power of dissuasion

today as anyother day its the same no one knows who there enamiy is going to be in 5 10 100 years

you are also a dinosaurus
your strategy principle are totally outdated, you live in the old world, Kapitain

fast projection forces is the key today, nuclear dissuasion is just obsolete from end of cold war.
So you’re advocating using nuclear weapons in conventional war? You’re the one whose living in the old world then, your thinking just like some of the people who were planning Operation Olympic or some of the strategists in the beginning of the cold war. If this is how the French think I’m glad the US has all those missile subs! One of our Ohios can wipe your nation off the face of the Earth and have rockets left over if you even contemplate using nukes to settle a dispute with us.

Saying that deterrence is obsolete is like saying the rifle is obsolete. If your enemy or potential enemy has nukes they won’t risk using them on you for fear of retaliation in kind. Look at the nations that are pursuing nuclear weapons? Iran and North Korea. Why do they want them? Equality with the west!
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote