I actually liked the review a lot (I don't have the game, so I can gauge how informative it was) but its certainly a bit contradictory in the conclussions. Thyro has a point here: After reading the article I was suprised by the ending "It is hard not to recommend it". I don't know if your emphasis on the bugs during the review gave the false impression that there were some non-negotiable deal breakers, or if it was the emphasis on the final conclussions what actually gave the false impression that you liked the game. But there is certainly a bit of lack of synchronization. Other than that, I want to repeat again that it was IMHO a fair and objective review. Coing from an airdale
, it is a refreshing thing for those of us who are may be too focused an no longer impartial.
