Quote:
Originally Posted by pythos
Yes the initial post dealt with a news article dealing with yet another failure of DRM, a failure that is the result of a crack. However there were no addresses given pertaining to where to get the crack. It was simply an article about the failure of DRM. - Discussing cracks, even discussing articles about cracks, isn't allowed by the rules. END OF STORY. (or at least it should have been..)
The thread from Uber was concerning the closing of this thread. this thread was also closed. - Should have been a PM to the mod that locked it, not a public cry for attention.
The next thread from uber was asking why that thread had been closed. - Should have been a PM to Neal, not yet another public cry for attention.
The last two threads were no where near being in violation of the rules, and the closing of the second thread is what lead to the ensuing silliness. - not against the rules, but no good could come from them.
|
Last two threads never should have been threads. First thread was properly closed and that decision should have been accepted or discussed with mods via PM. Two fruitless posts and a melodramatic "Oh lordy, I quit!" post is the problem here, not the locking of a thread that was clearly against the rules and yet more DRM spam.