Quote:
Originally Posted by goldorak
In the real world it doesn't work like that. Generals can have all the strategic view they want but its the men on the ground that have to implement your strategy.
If your men are poor fighters, nothing is going to reverse your defeat on the battlefield even if you have excellent Generals in your staff.
The 2 go hand in hand. And sometimes victory on the field has been achieved notwithstanding poor strategic and tactical view. Maybe because the adversary was even in worse conditions than your army etc...
The bugs in SH 5 weren't programmed by Ubisoft suits.
It was the dev team that programmed the game. It was the dev team that recycled more or less some parts of SH 3 and 4 for SH 5. It was the dev team that choose to implement features in certain specific ways.
The features and bugs that are present in SH 5 are the dev teams fault and nobody else's if you want to cross every t and dot every i.
And as the lead dev said on this forum, there is no difference between us (dev team) and Ubisoft.
The failure of one is the failure of the other.
 |
__________________
....and on the eight day, god created merchant ships to ply the waters between the lands, and unto which was created a weakness to the holy torpedo so that man could blow thy living snot out of them.
...And all was good.
"Making a decision to not make a decision would still involve a decision-making process and such a thing has not happened." -sorlim, UBIsoft Community Developer
|