Do these people not understand that a child born to a US citizen (provided any other requirements on the books at the time of his/her birth are met) is by law a US citizen? The geographical location of the birth is irrelevant.
If they're going to continue making this argument, they could least approach it from a more viable angle, i.e., one that makes sense given the actual laws involved. Prove his mother wasn't a citizen, or that he had no legal claim to US citizenship as her natural born child because one of them didn't live in the US for the required amount of time before or after or at the right ages or whatever. Otherwise STFU already.
|