View Single Post
Old 04-21-10, 10:33 AM   #30
Faamecanic
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Off your Stb side with good solution
Posts: 1,065
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
That's personal preference; for me it was SH3 that was collecting dust. Doesn't change that you can't compare SH to AC.
Never played AC so I cant compare it. My point was when are people going to STOP defending Ubi and the crap they put out.

SH 3, 4, and now 5 would be total fail and only playable for a short time if not for our talented modders. Period. And that is unacceptable and reprehensible for a company with any dignity to put there name on a product that relies on FREE mods to fix it. But to do that 3 times in a row??

Frankly if I was a modder I would be INSULTED by UBI and those saying "look we left it more open and mod friendly for you...arent we great!"

MALE BOVINE FECAL MATTER. You left it open and moddable because you KNEW you were releasing a piece of garbage. And you are DEPENDING on the mod community to fix it..... If they wanted to leave the game open to modding....then release the SDK and stop screwing with us.
Faamecanic is offline   Reply With Quote