View Single Post
Old 03-29-10, 12:42 PM   #7
Ark
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fresno, CA.
Posts: 581
Downloads: 95
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TempDude View Post
The type IX wasnt all that different from the type VII.
The former had more length, mass, slightly extended range and an extra rear torp-tube. Other than that they didnt really stand out. Visually they didnt have the "saddle-tanks" of the type VII so it had a sleeker appearence.
The Type IX were also less manouverable and took longer to dive as compared to the type VII.
In short, is it worth the trouble of making a new sub for SH5?

As for the type II: It was a boat designed not to stray too far from the coast. If the Type II were to be introduced into SH5 then new short-range missions would have to be made.

Those or just my 2 cents though.

The LAST thing we want is more options!

__________________
Ark
--------------
Vista 64-bit SP1
Asus P6T Deluxe mobo
Core i7 920 @ 3.8ghz
6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
Evga GTX 285 SSC
SB X-FI Fatality
640GB WD "Black"
Dell 3007WFP-HC 30" LCD / Acer 23" H233H
Ark is offline   Reply With Quote