View Single Post
Old 03-26-10, 01:35 PM   #4
Charlie901
XO
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 413
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum View Post
Gunnodayak, u still keep bashing the devs for some unknown reason. For me, the only responsible for this epic fail is only Ubi. I mean, u must be blind or something if you can't see that this is an unfinished product. There is no excuse for Ubi to launch a game with only the graphic part finished. They are the publishers, they should know better if a game is ready or not for release, is their job.

Well that's probably because the Devs may very well be totally responsible for this pile of Cr@p!!!

Lets just asume to say that UBI ordered this title out the door in it's current state. If so, it really makes you wonder what the heck it was that the Dev Team was doing with this title for 3+years when they already had the excellent foundation of SH3 & 4 to build upon. SH5 Graphics are nice but look what modders have done to SH4 with no code access and in a relatively short amount of time to make it comparable to SH5 graphically.

Lets face it, the Devs weren't; "Reinventing the Wheel" here. Case in Point: A mere week after SH5's release, tons of Mods were released, finishing and fixing many issues that any of the Devs could have addressed in an hour or so "With the Open Code lying right in their faces".

Makes me wonder if the Devs were just jerking around like most office staff updating their "Facebook" pages and playing Solitare rather than working hard to complete a quality product and UBI finally said; "Enough is enough", and pulled the rug out from under them, releasing this title in the stinking state that it is.

So until we know the real story I think its safe to say that we can't assume one group is guilty over the other of releasing this one as a stinking TURD!
Charlie901 is offline   Reply With Quote