Quote:
Tribesman... one simple question
Do you think it is fair for an individual to be required by law to purchase a good or service, whatever it might be or else be fined or punished for not doing so?
examples:
|
oh dear thats a hard question. I take it you have now realised that your "subsidised" approach was very faulty in relation to both business and individuals.
Quote:
|
you must eat one meal a day at McDonalds or else you will be fined the cumulative cost of all the meals you didnt eat there.
|
Is there any possible way a Mcd consumed in America can be covered under the constitution?
Quote:
|
You are required by law to purchase one high end gaming computer from dell for every room in your home, if you choose not to you will be fined the cost of all that equipment.
|
Does Dell with all its overseas opearations and the fact that there are viable alternatives within the US entirely negate that approach?
Quote:
You are required to have a land line telephone and the service must be through AT&T, if you elect not to have a land line you will be fined the cost of the service.
|
Now you is getting down to business
So if for example an organisation which set limits on a countries financial rating which meant the measure of that countries ability could meet the requirements for financial and industrial expansion in relation to access to available credit....then yes....can you name a country or organisation that goes along those guidelines?
Have a clue you live in one and....errrr....you live in one.
If you get lost on your answerr then think "you live in one" and other people go by that measure and depend on the terms set up in the country you live in.
Quote:
Personally, i don't think any of those situations are fair in the least, and here in the United States, this represents a gross overstepping of bounds by government.
|
We have recently seen how little you understand the bounds of your own government in a relatively straightforward look at the constitution, so for you to claim an overstepping puts the onus fairly on you.
Given past efforts by yourself to show how your interpretation of the constitution and all its amendments is correct I expect this to be a rather short and inconsequencial effort on your part.