Yes, I have been very open about that "bonding with the devs". I tend to bond quite easily to people I find intelligent, inspiring, thoughtful, honest, and hard-working. I think I have bonded with a lot of people in these forums, players and devs. The mission statement here is
to enhance the submarine simulation experience for all players and create a community where the game developers and players can share the fun of playing good games, study naval history, and interact globally in person and online.
Sure, I understand what you mean about "bending over", that's a very crude slight against people who accept a game like SH5 or SH2 as someone who is weak, and easily manipulated. You want these people, of which I am one, to accept your label. Whatever. But how often are you going to keep repeating that insult?
We do not have our head in the sand. I am fully aware that SH2 was a finished but fundamentally flawed game. *Shrug* I still got some enjoyment out of it. SH3 was a fantastic game, nothing to say there. SH4 was unfinished and buggy, but after 4 patches, was a good game. SH5 is unfinished, of questionable design, and buggy. I know that, but I do like the game in some ways. And I will be clear about areas where the game fails, where it is dismal, as well as what things it does right and where it shines. If the scales tip in favor of the flaws, so be it. Sorry if my lack of hysteria over that disturbs you.
cheers
Neal