The subsim members who met the devs were told of the excellent SH5 in development. Surely that version of SH5 must still be in development because the monkey UBI released last week is, well, anything but.
Should we now conclude that the integrity of the devs has been compromised ? If not then perhaps the devs would like to present their case here in this topic ?
As a life long developer myself (no pun intended) I sympathise greatly with the often illogical demands placed on developers by management. But I find it increasingly difficult to defend them based on their pro-SH5 postings to date.
So devs, please feel free to explain to this small floppy community why you should not have a slice of blame for this distasterous iteration of the sinking SH series ? Please help us to maintain subsims unequivical support of you and your work.
Thanks
