Quote:
Originally Posted by jerm138
Because you bought the game from UBISOFT, not the developers.
Let's say I'm looking to buy a 5-year old house. And while doing my pre-closing inspection, I notice many problems with the house: Crooked doorways, the shingles are crooked, the floor squeaks... you get the idea.
Should I:
a) Decide I don't like it and stick with my current house?
b) Make an offer to buy the house AFTER the owner fixes the problems?
c) Call up the builder and throw a fit because he didn't build the house I want?
Choices 'a' and 'b' are reasonable.
Choice 'c' is absurd. So is blaming the developers of SH5.
|
Very poor analogy.
I buy my kitchen equipment from Kmart. If any of it falls apart, by your logic, Kmart is to blame as the authorised seller, when in fact the responsibility to fix is with the manufacturer (heck, they give me a warranty just for this reason).
And here's the flaw in your logic...who are we asking to produce patches? the devs? or the publisher? Who will code the patches? the devs? or the publisher? If the patches fix bugs, who will we thank? the devs? or the publisher?