I think he has the same issues as most people who do reviews: an abject black hole when it comes to mathematics and normal distributions, standard deviations etc.
If that seems insulting, then his review is saying that the graphics, crew interactions, enemy AI and U-boat model cannot, in any way, be improved. That is, after all, what 100% means.
Reviews all over the net display this ridiculous approach, so much so that a score of 80-85% is seen as 'pass'.
It's all so stupid I completely ignore scores and look for substance in reviews. In this case, there's as much substance behind this review as their is science behind the score.
Either it's a massive satire, or the reviewer knows dick about mathematics etc.
Of course that's simply my take on it.
|