Quote:
And just what is the evil RSRDC begin accused of breaking and where is your documented proof?
|
Lurker don't be so touchy!
RSRD is fantastic, I never said it was evil at all, and I NEVER have accused it of breaking anything. Please re-read the comment, and put it also in connection with previous posts of mine in this thread, and the job I'm trying to do:
I had taken for granted that RSRD did not touch anything in sensors, because AFAIK there has always been stated by RFB and you that compatibility was ensured because of touching mostly different areas. Now, when I created a set of custom files to enable via JSGME and be able to tweak them with JSGME backed-up originals, I suddenly get the message that the conflict on sensors.dat is not with RFB as expected, but with RSRD instead! Thus I look into the RSRD in my mods folder, and realize that it certainly does ship a sensors.dat file. So I question wether the previous tweaks and tests done and results obtained were or not correct *if* RSRD sensors.dat is also installed, and ask how many people also have RSRD installed. I do not by any means pretend to say that the sensors.dat file in RSRD is breaking anything, but it is reasonable that I question wether tests results with/without it installed are different, and feel bad for some hours spent in a work that I am no longer sure is necessary valid for STOCK RFB2.0 -which is the first goal.
Note that RSRD versions in all users are not necessary up to date, so it could happen that RFB makes changes in some files, which are overwritten when enabling a version of RSRD that was released previous to RFB 2.0 and not yet revised by you.
What amazes me most is that you, as experienced modder, jump at me feeling offended for something I have NOT even said, and start requesting documented proofs for supposed accusations I have never done, or even pretended to do. I feel really sad for such a touchy reaction, the more so because it never was meant to be what you pretend, and not even able to be extracted from my post.
Quote:
I'm currently at work and when I get home we will find out who is breaking what and find out if Hitmans claim is valid
|
I have not done a single claim


You are putting in my mouth words I have NEVER said!!! The only "claim" I have done is to say that RSRD also ships a sensors.dat file, and hence I had not been working with a vanilla RFB 2.0 so far. I don't think that I speak english that bad as to get such a misinterpretation, come on
EDITED TO ADD:
Actually research so far has shown that the visual sensors of the submarine's crew might be hardcoded and not even controlled by sensors.dat