Quote:
|
Originally Posted by timmyg00
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
And that SC was not a "bed of roses" I certainly have a good reason to remember all to well.  |
Which has what relevance, exactly, to Dangerous Waters? |
Ask him. He referred to SC's developement/patching not beeing a bed of roses, as if anyone had said something different. Noone had.
You guys are really trying hard to make what I said look queer. But one can see that often: that a player likes something, and now he is pressing hard that others have to like it, too, and see it his way.
Yes, once a month, or longer, I pop up here and comment, but I scan the forum constantly. It's just that I do not engage in debates about this or that detail of gameplay. I do not have that game, currently, so hwo should I go into it'S details? (It's not details that irritate me when still not buying.) My point of interest is the future remedy to the things that were reported here in this forum as things worth to be fixed. This my interest is understandable, for if they get fixed, I will rethink my position on buying.
I HAVE NOT BASHED SA in this thread, hammer this into your fanatical little anti-Skybird-head, will you?
this topic asked if the sale policy of SA with DW maybe was unwise, if there was a lack of advertisment maybe, or if the shipping model was the best option, and on that I commented in my first reply, before you guys started to bring this thing down again, and I commented on the niche-segment the game covers, still beeing rivalled by SC, I reported that many people know of the game and still don't buy it, and I thought loud that not only SC and the complexity may have something to do with it, but also the after half a year still missing final patch - as one factor amongst others. Jamie admitted some weeks ago that things don'T sell as well as they hoped. Why this is so is the theme of this topic, not Skybird. But what makes skybird still beeing hesitant to buy NOW nevertheless may shed some light on one of the reasons, a reason that obviously is shared by many others.
The comment on money-back: that is my reply to your guy's queer logic that one can only judge if it is worth to buy if one buys it, because if you find out that you better would have not and kept weaiting, you will be left with the damage alone. Of course you think BEFORE you buy, for the reason that you have not back-deal-insurance. Don't understand your complaints on that.
you like the game like it is and spend money for it, okay, no problem for me. currently I have doubts that is is worth for me, you read: I speak of >>ME<<, to spend 65 bucks for it, and I gave my reasons for that in two threads earlier, some weeks and months ago, and touched them shortly here again. Now could this be okay for you, please?
I would like to refer to Mark's answer some postings above. There were some things worth to be think about in his reply, and that maybe are part of the answer to this thread'S internal question, why DW does not sell as expected. This is the thing that we discuss here - not Skybird.