View Single Post
Old 02-11-10, 08:09 PM   #3
Frederf
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 665
Downloads: 79
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngusJS View Post
Could the SH map center on the North Atlantic, say by using 45 degrees N as its "equator", so that the main area of operations would suffer from the least amount of distortion?
Theoretically yes, the "line of no distortion" is where the cylinder intersects the globe which can be any pairs of latitude. The cylinder can cut through the globe such that the equator region is projected inward and has a contraction distortion while the pole regions have an expansion distortion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisgeis View Post
It mimicked ships being obscured by the horizon by making them sink lower into the water, the further away they were. The only problem with this was that you could see the waterline and then the horizon behind it, rather than seing the hull obscured by the horizon.
I thought SH3 was like that but SH4 had a better solution? That's terrible and explains why it's so easy to spot ships in SH3 and SH4, they are so drastically highlighted by being off the horizon.

It should still be reminded that a spherical worldspace and a spherical actionspace are two entirely independent concepts. Either could be addressed in any order or combination without interdependence. Silent Hunter could get a curved actionspace (or localspace if you like) and retain the old, flat worldspace or vice versa.
Frederf is offline   Reply With Quote