Quote:
|
If the thread is closed then the subject spawns up every now and then when a new member wants to know more about this specific thing because he once heard or has seen some of it. And now wants to know more. This creates alot more work for the search function to work through, as each mention of the mod/whatever name needs to be analysed. It also is kind of depressing seeing all those short threads with essentially nothing more than a short description by older members and maybe a link to the original. Sure, new members never heard about a search function, so most of this paragraph I wrote is moot. But wouldn't it be better to keep the discussion in the thread where it all started?
|
Thought myself the same, but in the end I believe it is better to respect Makman's decission. He worked hard to give it to the community, and if he wants to rest and discontinue his work, it is fair to accept it like that. The thread is about a mod, and obviously as long as it is open, users can make requests and expect feedback, morally forcing the creator of the mod to step in and answer them. I remember some time ago that OLC got fed up of modding, people or whatever, and instead of requesting the thread to be closed he went to his posts and edited them to delete the contents. This created even more nonesense and made the discussion completely impossible to understand/follow. I prefer that Makman's posts stay there on a closed thread instead of A) Annoying him when the thread is bumped again, B) Make him delete everything, C) Start a potentially damaging dynamic.
But of course I might be wrong, I don't pretend to be right at all, just to do what I see best in each moment. If Makman dissapears from the forums, and/or people open many threads about his mod, we might reconsider it all.
