Just to clarify some things
:
-There is absolutely no problem in discussing and comparing supermods here, as long as it is clearly stated that you are talking about personal preferences/likings.
-The problems appear when someone claims that this or the other mod is more realistic than the other. All teams have worked hard in their supermods, and all of them have made the choices they felt best to provide a realistic experience, so it is logical that they don't like to hear unbacked comments writingf off their work as unrealistic, or less realistic than other.
It must be understood that in the limited environment of a computer game, most things when you mod striving for realism end up being a compromise, and choosing the lesser of two evils. That's the moment when different teams make different choices, and all of them are equally respectable, because there is no such thing as perfection here. Add to that the fact that many times the hard work of modders is not properly used/understood by users because they don't realize that they are not using it correctly. An example: The night vision and the realism in the sensors. Take look around for opinions about that, and you will see many users complaining about too dark nights and/or too blind escorts. But the fact is that the guy who put a hard work calibrating them probably had a different gamma setting than other users (Those who are now not satisfied), and the end-users usually blame him instead of making the simple tweak of adjusting their gamman settings to match the behaviour of the game. The enemy can't see you? Then reduce your gamma until you barely can't see him either! Adjust your settings to the game, instead of waiting for the opposite. Works marvels
