Quote:
Originally Posted by Adriatico
???
You got it wrong Meo...
|
Ooops... read too fast,
See, I'm way too much influenced!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
Just my opinion,  I would say that although Aces was a great sim for its time, it is nowhere near as deep as SH3/SH4/Sub Command/ Dangerous Waters. What do you think makes Aces is "deeper" than SH3? It does radio messages better than SH3, had good gameplay, and some static messages from the "bar", but where does Aces surpass the quad mentioned above? Aces has no sonar station, no manual TDC, very limited ability to "look around" on the bridge, static stations, Crummy graphics compared to today, and no AI crew.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to override your opinion or start a fight, but I think this is a nice topic to discuss and I am curious on what you base that on.  |
Well I admit those are only conjectures. I've based my comparison with Aces of the deep on so many comments I've seen so far, (never played it). They were all saying the complete opposite of this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens
Aces was a great sim for its time, it is nowhere near as deep as SH3/SH4/
|
But I just miss the good old days of Fallout 1, Panzer General 2, etc.
... and people here (and Ubi too) have almost convinced me that SH5 would be dumbed down.