Quote:
It is not an article of trespass. All these articles are part of "Disturbance of the peace". Trespassing is an entirely different part of the law.
Also, check my previous post (which you may not have read yet by now), the 'trespassing' described is not the 'normal' trespassing but a special case.
|
"A special place" like in a council meeting after being told to leave
So unlawful presence in a room dedicated to the public service....with a doubled up charge possible as he not only remained after the representaive of the council asked him to leave, he remained after the representative of the police commisioner asked him
Quote:
|
Well, "of course" isn't exactly a good argument, is it?
|
When the point is so basic then "of course" is entirely sufficient.
Quote:
|
where I come up with laws and such to prove my point, everything you can think of in response is "of course".
|
There lies one problem, you are claiming its one of a long set of laws, the person claiming to be your father in your link says it is one specific law which is not on your list.
Quote:
Erm, the specific crime is only listed once, in the center of the article. Namely: "ordeverstoring", translated as simply "disruption".
I don't know what you read at the bottom of the page, but it wasn't the "specific crime".
|
Sorry you have to go to the follow up story where the person claiming to be your father posts the two letters he recieved from the public prosecutor
The first deals with the basic prosecution and the option of paying the fine. It contains a summary of the charge and the article of law it is under.
The second is the summons with the date of the court appearance and the specific details of the charge.
Quote:
didn't I just show you the article that shows it isn't? "verboden plaats"="prohibited place"=what I just described.
Nothing more. A place with a "do not enter - private property" sign is not called a "verboden plaats".
It might be in the Irish law, but in the Dutch law there's a difference.
|
See above.
Quote:
|
That's what it MUST be about cause that's all my dad was doing at the time, holding up a flag. He wasn't shouting, he wasn't fighting, he wasn't doing anything but holding up that flag. How can you possibly maintain the flag had nothing to do with it?
|
Because the flag is only incidental, the prosecution has nothing to do with the flag, it is entirely to do with a failure to comply with the law and procedure.