Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Yes he was.
Thats his job, keeping order in meetings.
|
He cannot simply throw out anyone he doesn't like. He must have a good reason first to do so. which he didn't have cause all my dad was doing was holding up a flag.
Quote:
Quote:
|
refusing to follow instructions of an official is not called "disturbing the peace" or anything.
|
Of course it is.
|
Well, "of course" isn't exactly a good argument, is it? where I come up with laws and such to prove my point, everything you can think of in response is "of course".
Quote:
|
Its easy, the person claiming to be your father posted the writ on that blog you linked to. The specific crime is listed at the bottom.
|
Erm, the specific crime is only listed once, in the center of the article. Namely: "ordeverstoring", translated as simply "disruption".
I don't know what you read at the bottom of the page, but it wasn't the "specific crime".
Quote:
|
A prohibited place is any place covered by laws and by-laws....like a government building, though even a public park or road can be a prohibited place.
|
didn't I just show you the article that shows it isn't? "verboden plaats"="prohibited place"=what I just described.
Nothing more. A place with a "do not enter - private property" sign is not called a "verboden plaats".
It might be in the Irish law, but in the Dutch law there's a difference.
Quote:
|
You keep on going on about "the flag". It has nothing whatsoever to do with the flag, it is entirely about his conduct.
|
That's what it MUST be about cause that's all my dad was doing at the time, holding up a flag. He wasn't shouting, he wasn't fighting, he wasn't doing anything but holding up that flag. How can you possibly maintain the flag had nothing to do with it?
PS - as a "friendly reminder": let's keep this thread civil and not start name-calling as has happened when I had a similar discussion with OneToughHerring. So far everything's fine so let's keep it that way
