Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
No that piece of causing trouble came after that "pesky usher" had already told him to stop or leave. That failure alone merits arrest as under the law as that pesky usher is charged with maintaining order in the municipal meeting on the direction of the chair. To then continue after the police arrive could actually merit another charge.
|
The making trouble only started after the police came. Maybe something else got a bit lost in translation so please cite the 1st sentence where my dad is shouting/causing trouble according to you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
you demonstrate that you don't understand the laws or the rights concerning protest.
|
I think I understand the Dutch law a lot better than you. I see you come from Ireland, you may know all the Irish law by heart but this isn't Ireland and we Dutchmen have got other laws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
So for entertainment value can you enlighten people as to exactly which paragraph and article of the Criminal code in your country your father was convicted of breaking.....then explain how it isn't the law in your country and how he didn't break it.
|
As you wish
now THAT's something more specific than just a "fact" and something I can actually help you with
OK, this is the Dutch law concerning the article my father was accused of breaking (art. 429bis-442a) (
http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/Wet...echt.html#2598)
The articles say the following: (allow me for leaving out some obscure articles like "you may not falsely use the name of the Red Cross" and such)
You may not:
- commit blasphemy
- when in function: discriminate because of race, beliefs, gender or sexual orientation
- be on a prohibited place without permission
- photograph/draw any military installations, without permission
- be naked on public places, unless indicated otherwise
- disturb the nightly peace
- claim a royal/noble/etc. title
- etc etc etc
You can read it for yourself, my dad did none of these things.